Skip to main content

Integration in Internet ?

Nowadays, the business need of system integration in one company become more and more important task. Many companies search for good, cheep and easily developed portal solutions so they can make one common entry point for their systems and no doubt, the best Microsoft solution for this task is the SharePoint platform.

While companies and enterprise integration have many options and products, what about the Internet integration? Is there a simple and no resources required way to recreate the idea of integration?

The reason for trying to do this is the fact that there are many areas in internet where we can make a portal collecting different sources and information and making this in a very simple and cheep way. And of course, if we make good and useful portal, this will not be a waste of time ad money.
Making or using some crawlers and displaying the results in categorized way is good but not so cheep solution.
As a big fen of Google, I try to combine their services and to see how can I recreate the idea of integration. 
I get for example my personal "web systems"- two blogs, facebook profile, personal web site. And the picture is something like this:



The personal site will be the user entry point and will have RSS from the blogs and facebook profile. The data storage will be the Picasa (for images) and code.google.com(for files) and the monitoring will be Google Analytics.

Actually, the example is not very clear but the idea of iterating things is really good concept and it's worth to be experimented with it.
And to best thing is such approaches is that we don't replace the existing systems ( in many case this is impossible), we just combine them and get to the user better experience and analytics data.


...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ClientPeoplePicker in SharePoint 2013

Start using SharePoint 2013 I noticed that the way for selecting people or groups is changed.
The new way is simple – just ‘Enter name or email address’ without any icons for ‘Check Names’ or ‘Browse’. I guess that the PeoplePicker is changed but NO. PeoplePicker sitll has the same functionality as before.
There is a new control called ClientPeoplePicker.

How to use it:
1.Add this references

<%@RegisterTagPrefix="wssawc"Namespace="Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls"Assembly="Microsoft.SharePoint, Version=15.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c"%>
2.Add the following control declaration


      <wssawc:ClientPeoplePicker Required="true" ValidationEnabled="true" ID="peoplePicker" runat="server" InitialHelpText="<%$Resources:wss,aclinv_PickerIntialHelperText%>" VisibleSuggestions="3" Rows="1" AllowMultipleEntities="false" CssClass

Using SharePoint Attachments' controls with elevated security

The scenario:  Create custom forms for Add/Edit/Delete items to a list which is not accessible by the regular users. The forms should support working with attachments.

The problem: The default SharePoint controls don’t work if the current user doesn’t have access to the list items.

The solution:Use custom code for generating the SharePoint default HTML so the out-of-the-box javascript works correct.

Explanations: 
The scenario occurs when some list need to be hidden form the users. The list has broken security inheritance and users can't navigate directly to it.

Working with its fields requires crating web warts or application pages with appropriate controls on them and server-side code running under elevated privileges. The issue here is that the OOTB (out-of-the-box) controls for Attachments don't work if the user doesn’t have access to the related list item.

The OOTB controls are: AttachmentsField, AttachmentUpload, AttachmentButton. There is a lot of code how to use them so h…

The column name that you entered is already in use or reserved. Choose another name.

The problem: 
You want to create column with a specific name in SharePoint but SharePoint gives you the message "The column name that you entered is already in use or reserved. Choose another name."



Why this is a problem?
Because you need to create custom columns and content types using the default SharePoint interface.
And the business users have to see properly named columns - for example "Description", not "My Description".

Solution:
It is important to know something technical about SharePoint (versions Office 365, 2013, 2010):
 - it supports columns with same Display Names.
 - you can’t have columns with same Internal names

Let’s implement the following common scenario:
You are creating a SharePoint customization and you need the following column:
   Type: Multiple lines of text
   Internal Name: MyProjectDescription
   Display Name: Description

 Here is the correct way to achieve it:
1. Create the column MyProjectDescription.
This will create column with I…